<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. House Chaplain Talks about Conflict and his Unusual Congregation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jesuit.org/blog/index.php/2012/05/u-s-house-chaplain-talks-about-conflict-and-his-unusual-congregation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jesuit.org/blog/index.php/2012/05/u-s-house-chaplain-talks-about-conflict-and-his-unusual-congregation/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard J. Tyrrell</title>
		<link>http://www.jesuit.org/blog/index.php/2012/05/u-s-house-chaplain-talks-about-conflict-and-his-unusual-congregation/comment-page-1/#comment-13765</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard J. Tyrrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 23:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesuit.org/blog/?p=6313#comment-13765</guid>
		<description>I too, as a Jesuit priest and professor at Gonzaga, support the preferential option for the poor, which is a part of being a Jesuit.  As I understand it, fruitful dialogue between the minority and the majority should be the goal of every member of Congress and of the President.  I pray for all concerned that they may be able and willing to have this fruitful dialogue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too, as a Jesuit priest and professor at Gonzaga, support the preferential option for the poor, which is a part of being a Jesuit.  As I understand it, fruitful dialogue between the minority and the majority should be the goal of every member of Congress and of the President.  I pray for all concerned that they may be able and willing to have this fruitful dialogue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Horan</title>
		<link>http://www.jesuit.org/blog/index.php/2012/05/u-s-house-chaplain-talks-about-conflict-and-his-unusual-congregation/comment-page-1/#comment-13759</link>
		<dc:creator>William Horan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesuit.org/blog/?p=6313#comment-13759</guid>
		<description>[What’s it like to be well-schooled in Catholic social teaching as Congress grapples with the budget?

There is a strong theology at play: people who believe that taking care of the poor is what churches do, not what government does, that maybe government is over-reaching. But my position is to observe — not to engage in that argument.]

Yes, the churches have the primary responsibility. The following is a sign that the Catholic Church is not doing its job:
A “preferential option for the poor” should be maintained in our Catholic Schools. If we find that we cannot afford to keep our schools open to the poor, the schools should be closed and the resources used for something else which can be kept open to the poor. We cannot allow our Church to become a church primarily for the middle-class and rich while throwing a bone to the poor. The priority should be given to the poor even if we have to let the middle-class and rich fend for themselves.
Practically speaking, the Catholic Schools must close and the resources used for “Confraternity of Christian Doctrine” and other programs which can be kept open to the poor. Remember, the Church managed without Catholic Schools for centuries. We can get along without them today. The essential factor is to cultivate enough Faith to act in the Gospel Tradition, namely, THE POOR GET PRIORITY. The rich and middle-class are welcome too. But the
poor come first. (William Horan — w.horan@comcast.net.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[What’s it like to be well-schooled in Catholic social teaching as Congress grapples with the budget?</p>
<p>There is a strong theology at play: people who believe that taking care of the poor is what churches do, not what government does, that maybe government is over-reaching. But my position is to observe — not to engage in that argument.]</p>
<p>Yes, the churches have the primary responsibility. The following is a sign that the Catholic Church is not doing its job:<br />
A “preferential option for the poor” should be maintained in our Catholic Schools. If we find that we cannot afford to keep our schools open to the poor, the schools should be closed and the resources used for something else which can be kept open to the poor. We cannot allow our Church to become a church primarily for the middle-class and rich while throwing a bone to the poor. The priority should be given to the poor even if we have to let the middle-class and rich fend for themselves.<br />
Practically speaking, the Catholic Schools must close and the resources used for “Confraternity of Christian Doctrine” and other programs which can be kept open to the poor. Remember, the Church managed without Catholic Schools for centuries. We can get along without them today. The essential factor is to cultivate enough Faith to act in the Gospel Tradition, namely, THE POOR GET PRIORITY. The rich and middle-class are welcome too. But the<br />
poor come first. (William Horan — <a href="mailto:w.horan@comcast.net">w.horan@comcast.net</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>